<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Under The Influence: Kirk Defends White House Ban Of Lobbyists On Advisory Boards</title>
        <link>http://undertheinfluence.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/kirk-defends-white-house-ban-o.php?rss=1</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:33:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
       
        <item>
            <title>Kirk Defends White House Ban Of Lobbyists On Advisory Boards</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>From this morning's <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/earlybirdtopnews.php">Earlybird</a>:</p>

<p>&#8226; U.S. Trade Representative <strong>Ron Kirk</strong> on "Monday defended a new White House policy that would trim federally registered lobbyists from the ranks of agency advisory boards and commissions, a move that has drawn a rebuke from the trade community," <em><a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/congressdaily/cda_20091006_7626.php" target="blank">CongressDaily AM</a> (subscription)</em> reports. "The Obama administration policy, first announced Sept. 23 by <strong>Norm Eisen</strong>, special counsel for ethics and government reform, on the White House blog, is part of the administration's efforts to clamp down on lobbyists' influence in Washington."</p>

<p>&#8226; SEIU "is coming under fire from conservatives because of its long-standing financial and leadership ties to ACORN, a liberal organizing group recently embarrassed by videos filmed covertly," the <em><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/05/AR2009100503585.html" target="blank">Washington Post</a></em> reports. "Some Republicans say federal agencies that recently cut ties with ACORN -- the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now -- should also consider severing their relationship with the Service Employees International Union. The SEIU and ACORN have long worked closely together, with the union paying the association more than $3.6 million in the past three years and sharing some office locations and leaders with the group."</p>

<p>&#8226; "A mining company owned by Goldman Sachs and two private equity funds is in line to get a $3 million earmark for work at a rare earth elements mine in Mountain Pass, Calif. -- raising questions as to why Congress would take on some of the risk for a bailed-out investment giant that's already making a profit," <em><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/27947.html" target="blank">Politico</a></em> reports. "Rep. <strong>Jerry Lewis</strong> (R-Calif.) inserted the earmark for the mine into the House Defense appropriations bill, and backers say it's a legitimate national security concern. The military needs rare earth elements, and China -- which is rich in them -- has threatened to cut off exports. But some government watchdogs question whether taxpayers should be asked to prop up a project that is already funded by wealthy investors who expect to make a profit."</p>

<p>&#8226; "The political committees of Louisiana Sen. <strong>David Vitter</strong>, Mississippi Gov. <strong>Haley Barbour</strong> and former Rep. <strong>Chip Pickering</strong> (R-Miss.) have been accused of scheming to conceal a contribution from Pickering to Vitter in violation of federal campaign finance laws," <em><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/27918.html" target="blank">Politico</a></em> reports. "The Louisiana Democratic Party plans to file a formal complaint with the Federal Election Commission today, charging that Barbour's PAC essentially filtered a $5,000 campaign donation from Pickering's PAC to Louisiana Vitter's 2010 reelection committee to make it look like the contribution didn't come directly from Pickering."</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://undertheinfluence.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/kirk-defends-white-house-ban-o.php?rss=1</link>
            <guid>http://undertheinfluence.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/kirk-defends-white-house-ban-o.php?rss=1</guid>

            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:33:31 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
		
		


       
    </channel>
</rss>
  
