My Account | Free Trial | Sign In
Submit site feedback
National Journal.com

nationaljournal.com > Under the Influence

NationalJournal.com Home Under the Influence Home Under the Influence Home

National Journal's Under the Influence

Wednesday, October 14, 2009 2:00 PM

Horace Cooper, who served as a staffer for former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, R-Texas, and as chief of staff for two executive branch agencies, indicated today that he will go to trial to fight charges that he accepted tickets and meals from imprisoned ex-lobbyist Jack Abramoff in exchange for official actions that would benefit Abramoff's clients.

Cooper was indicted in August on five charges of conspiracy to commit honest services fraud and bribery, fraudulent concealment, false statements and obstruction of an official proceeding. The alleged crimes took place between 1998 and 2005, when Cooper served on Armey's staff and then as chief of staff at Voice of America and the Labor Department's Employment Standards Administration.

"We're here to fight the felony charges. We vehemently dispute them," Cooper's attorney, Solomon Wisenberg, said. "We look forward to our day in court."

Wisenberg would not respond to questions about whether Cooper had been offered a plea deal by the government.

If Cooper's case does go to trial, it will be only the third case associated with the Abramoff scandal to go before a jury. Kevin Ring, a former Abramoff lobbying associate, went to trial last month, and a jury is currently deliberating on the eight charges against him. Former White House aide David Safavian was tried first in 2006 and then retried in 2008, and was found guilty in both trials of lying to investigators and obstructing justice. To date, 20 people have been convicted, pleaded guilty or are awaiting trial in relation to the Abramoff scandal.

During a status conference today, the government offered a list of probable witnesses, including two former Abramoff associates, Neil Volz and Rodney Lane. Volz pleaded guilty in 2006 for his involvement in the Abramoff scandal and was sentenced to probation, community service and a fine. Lane has not been indicted on any crimes, and the government said today that he is not expected to be charged.

Abramoff was not on the probable witness list. "I doubt" Abramoff will be called as a witness, prosecutor Matthew Stennes said. "We'll certainly reserve that right. I don't think it will be necessary."

Also during the status conference, Wisenberg said that Cooper was unable "to make arrangements" for the attorney to continue representing him. The presiding judge, Ellen Huvelle, suggested that Cooper apply for a public defender or that another attorney may want to represent Cooper, "because it's an interesting case."

"There are people from major law firms who want to take cases like this," Huvelle said. She added that the delay in obtaining representation for Cooper will likely keep the case from going to trial before February at the earliest.

6 Responses

Ruby Genders

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon.
asbestos settlements | uk seo company

Megan Roberts

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Easily, the post is really the sweetest on this worthwhile topic. I fit in with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your approaching updates. Saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the exceptional clarity in your writing. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates.
asbestos lawyers | asbestos settlement

Ronald Regans

Saturday, September 4, 2010

I agree with you. You have given to us with such an large collection of information. Great work you have done by sharing them to all. simply superb.
asbestos attorneys | asbestos lawsuit
 

Johnson

Friday, August 27, 2010

Cooper was indicted in August on five charges of conspiracy to commit honest services fraud and bribery, fraudulent concealment, false statements and obstruction of an official proceeding. The alleged crimes took place between 1998 and 2005.

If they were really involved in the crime they should be punished with no mercy. Property auctions

Charly

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

I really wonder if he is guilty in the end. I guess it depends how powerfull friends he has in his netzwerk

james king

Monday, July 19, 2010

If he is guilty of these charges he needs to take responsibility. He should not fight this at all. I am not sure what he is thinking.

dorm bedding

Leave a response



Get Print-friendly version of this page E-mail this page to a friend Subscribe to comments for Former Aide To Fight Abramoff-Related Charges Follow us on Twitter
About    Contact    Employment    Reprints & Back Issues    Privacy Policy    Advertising
Copyright 2010 by National Journal Group Inc.
The Watergate · 600 New Hampshire Ave., NW Washington, DC 20037
202-739-8400· fax 202-833-8069 · NationalJournal.com is an Atlantic Media publication.