Friday, May 29, 2009 9:08 AM
Corporate-Environmental Alliance Breaks Mold
From this week's National Journal: (subscription)
- Although Washington has seen plenty of odd-bedfellow coalitions -- habitual antagonists forming temporary alliances of convenience on an issue, the U.S. Climate Action Partnership arguably took the phenomenon to a new level, writes Julie Kosterlitz. For more than two years, six environmental groups and 25 corporations representing divergent interests of their own sat down regularly to negotiate a detailed agreement on how to tackle one of the most complicated public policy issues of the day: cutting carbon pollutants to curtail global warming. Click here for story.
- In a look at the upcoming potential battle for President Obama's Supreme Court nominee, a team of National Journal reporters write for this week's magazine cover story: "The New York Yankees, the baseball team that Sonia Sotomayor says she
adores, was among the first to use the squeeze play to great and showy
effect nearly a century ago, occasionally even getting two runs with
one well-executed maneuver. Senators shouldn't be surprised, then, that
President Obama and his Supreme Court nominee know how to piece
together victories." Click here for story.
- From the K Street Corridor: Intel boosted its spending on Washington lobbying in the weeks before
the European Union fined the technology giant $1.4 billion for
violating antitrust rules; As the health care debate gets serious and Democrats hunt for revenue
to pay for reforms, a coalition of 100 business groups has deployed its
local associates during the congressional recess to lobby lawmakers to
keep a favorite tax provision-- "last in, first out" or LIFO.
Comments
To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Under the Influence does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.